Reasons for Abbot's Veto of SB3
- To ensure safety, Texas must strongly regulate (not ban) hemp immediately
- SB3 would never go into effect because of valid constitutional challenges
- Due to litigation challenging the bill, enforcement of SB3 would be prohibited for years, leaving many key "cases of abuse unaddressed."
- A similar bill passed in Arkansas in 2023; it was challenged, and the law sat dormant for nearly two years
- SB3 criminalizes what Congress legalized (via the 2018 Farm Bill) and puts state law and federal law on a "collision course"
- SB3 would invite potential criminal entrapment of farmers as well as make felons of other innocent Texans like "pharmacists stocking health supplements, veterans treating PTSD, and parents caring for epileptic children."
- SB3 could also result in an "unconstitutional taking of private property."
So, Abbott vetoed SB3 because the bill wouldn't do much to address any public safety concerns while opening up a whole can of worms, including a lawsuit, turning innocent people into felons, and constitutional crises.
Abbot's Proposed Alternative
He also proposed several regulations, including officially banning the sale of THC products to anyone under 21 (which we've been advocating for years), requiring child-proof packaging (which we have), and also banning the sale of hemp-derived THC products in Texas on Sundays, a regulatory framework similar to that of alcohol.
Therefore, he is calling for a
Special Session starting on July 21, 2025, to push for these changes. However, everything is still on the line, as Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick will most likely do everything in his power to
ban hemp-derived THC after this embarrassing defeat and, if not that, unreasonable regulations (just to be clear, we fully support reasonable regulations such as prohibiting the sale of THC products to people under 21) put in place that would otherwise strangle the hemp industry.
We Won the Battle- But the Fight is Not Over